Sunday, August 11, 2002
10:08 pm
Placing Morality above Interest
Simon Heffer has returned to the flaws in Britain's foreign policy under the Blair administration in his latest contribution to the Sunday Telegraph and starts off sensibly with the suggestion of closing down the Foreign Office. A statement of our relationship with other countries reduces to trade or war: actions designed to defend or enrich ourselves.
From such a promising start, this columnist attacks Blair for introducing the culture of spin into foreign policy and using Britain as a grandstand for his own posturing as "Assistant Saviour of the World". This is where I part company with Heffer as there is little evidence that our foreign policy is currently driven by opinion polls although it is aware of domestic restlessness. If Blair struts across our television screens at another junket, it is no more and no less than previous leaders have done.
Heffer does not attack the roots of Blairite foreign policy: an ethical foreign policy that follows and folds our interests into the tenets of liberal internationalism, couched in the rhetoric and sanctimoniousness of political correction. They deny discussion of Britain's interests on the grounds that their policy is moral. However, Heffer does not decry this moral discourse that currently suffocates foreign policy debate in public but uses it to privilege his own focal points: Gibralter and Zimbabwe.
However, we punch above our weight to a suicidal degree, and our increasingly unconvincing support of America risks jeopardising that crucial alliance while simultaneously reducing Mr Blair's credit among his pals in Europe.
If the Prime Minister wants to engage in real foreign policy rather than just pose, he must make what he likes to call "hard choices". He has to judge the difference between right and wrong better than hitherto, which means no more sucking up to Libya or Iran.
He has to start making unequivocal judgments about the threat by foreign powers to the interests of Britain, whether it be in Saddam's capacity to drop anthrax in Trafalgar Square, or Mugabe's racist murdering of British subjects in Zimbabwe.
It appears that Simon Heffer would not be able to judge Britain's current interests unless the scales of moral indignation drop from his eyes.
Simon Heffer has returned to the flaws in Britain's foreign policy under the Blair administration in his latest contribution to the Sunday Telegraph and starts off sensibly with the suggestion of closing down the Foreign Office. A statement of our relationship with other countries reduces to trade or war: actions designed to defend or enrich ourselves.
From such a promising start, this columnist attacks Blair for introducing the culture of spin into foreign policy and using Britain as a grandstand for his own posturing as "Assistant Saviour of the World". This is where I part company with Heffer as there is little evidence that our foreign policy is currently driven by opinion polls although it is aware of domestic restlessness. If Blair struts across our television screens at another junket, it is no more and no less than previous leaders have done.
Heffer does not attack the roots of Blairite foreign policy: an ethical foreign policy that follows and folds our interests into the tenets of liberal internationalism, couched in the rhetoric and sanctimoniousness of political correction. They deny discussion of Britain's interests on the grounds that their policy is moral. However, Heffer does not decry this moral discourse that currently suffocates foreign policy debate in public but uses it to privilege his own focal points: Gibralter and Zimbabwe.
However, we punch above our weight to a suicidal degree, and our increasingly unconvincing support of America risks jeopardising that crucial alliance while simultaneously reducing Mr Blair's credit among his pals in Europe.
If the Prime Minister wants to engage in real foreign policy rather than just pose, he must make what he likes to call "hard choices". He has to judge the difference between right and wrong better than hitherto, which means no more sucking up to Libya or Iran.
He has to start making unequivocal judgments about the threat by foreign powers to the interests of Britain, whether it be in Saddam's capacity to drop anthrax in Trafalgar Square, or Mugabe's racist murdering of British subjects in Zimbabwe.
It appears that Simon Heffer would not be able to judge Britain's current interests unless the scales of moral indignation drop from his eyes.
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2002
(915)
-
▼
August
(56)
- One for the Warbloggers The Crisis Within Islam...
- Dear Gordon, The Euro could cost you your job.
- Blair Losing Party Could that most unfriendly i...
- Living the Part Now that I've been named a left...
- The Hun are getting restless Is this rather unc...
- How they lie to us, again This is an excellent ...
- Why I keep a pseudonym Read this
- Back of the Class Poor old Michael Gove. All t...
- Civil Interventionism Whilst disregarding the m...
- Being nice to Oxfam I must say something nice. ...
- Rat Returns This rather draconian piece of legi...
- Stability Postpones Reform A short note on Jian...
- Zimwatch: Immiserisation and Kleptocracy Many c...
- No C-Change here An interesting discussion on w...
- I, Said The Sparrow, With My Bow and Arrow A br...
- As the Sad Season Ends... No silly season this ...
- Liberty for All? Liberty Log, a British Liberta...
- Unfinished Tales The terrorist bombing on Septe...
- Daddy no more One should point out that there h...
- So what are they? The Biased BBC site takes aim...
- Trivial Pursuit For those of us who enjoy the t...
- Keeping Tabs A rather cruel, but interesting si...
- Getting Noticed Congratulations to my improveme...
- History Lesson Jo Sobran asks us to remember wh...
- John Charmley I had the privilege of listening ...
- Saddam gets it wrong again Saddam Hussein is an...
- Leaving Alone There is speculation and more spe...
- Tony Blair, you're no Maggie Thatcher An awfull...
- Slowly Returning It is a truth rarely acknowled...
- Other Country's Wars Paul Gottfried writes on t...
- Real Libertarians? The Telegraph is all aquiver...
- Why trust the papers? As a former Telegraph dev...
- And why not? If a meglomaniac dictator is seemi...
- Onwards and Inwards This Times article contends...
- Placing Morality above Interest Simon Heffer ha...
- Squeaky Clean Europeans This from Private Eye: ...
- The Stable Eurozone Redux Italy's near the brin...
- Is Blair Next? Romania has been caught in the c...
- EU: Defender of Freedom The worrying moves of E...
- The Hypocrisies of Right and Left After the fir...
- The European Convention Giscard D'Estaing and t...
- Our tax money at work A gift from the Embassy o...
- Get the Euro. Lose Your Job Eurozone unemploym...
- What are the Tories for? Were are the Powellite...
- Is Liberty turning Eurosceptic? Liberty is now ...
- Speed Demons How many British troops are likely...
- The perils of unconditional support Yesterday w...
- Should I be nice to Europe? The EU has come out...
- Being Fair to Rumsfield Tom Fox tears at Rumsfi...
- The Cakewalk continues Of course this war in Ir...
- Fast Track The Senate decided to allow Bush to ...
- If they've got nothing to hide Most reporting o...
- Bad News
- Don't speak. Just Die Sam Francis comes out wi...
- And they want these guys to look after our money? ...
- Libelled It seems that if you are sceptical abo...
-
▼
August
(56)
0 comments:
Post a Comment